Viewing angles are excellent, though at wide angles brightness trails off. Like before there’s a cable clutter area on but only to slot the power cable through. ![]() The way the connections are positioned are the same, from the upward-facing CI interface to side-facing inputs and outputs. Like the C2, its reduced weight makes it easier to lift and position on furniture. ![]() That might not sound light, but the OLED65C1 was almost twice as heavy because of its stand. Overall, it took about four minutes to assemble the TV – a simpler process than it was to put together the OLED65C1 or the more recent Hisense A9H OLED. The rear panel isn’t as flat as the G3 (which is built for wall-mounting) with the rear packaging jutting out for a depth of 45.1mm. The screen is wafer-thin, and the bezel is barely noticeable. The LG OLED65C3 carries the same aesthetics as the C2 model, so it’s another gorgeously minimalist OLED that’s surprisingly lightweight for a 65-inch TV. The difference is that the latter’s stand can swivel (on a pad hidden beneath the stand), and it’s WiSA compatible up to 2.1-channels. The 65-inch has gone up in price compared to the C2, from £2699 to £2999.Īs per usual there are different versions: OLED65C34LA and OLED65C36LC. Let’s see whether the LG C3 can once again best its rivals, for there are many more adversaries for it to conquer than there were in 2022… The LG C3 OLED receives a step up in price where it’s more expensive than Samsung’s first gen QD-OLED and the same price as the Sony A95K, both of which use panel technology that claims to be more accurate and colourful. The latest iteration of LG’s most popular and best-selling OLED looks to improve on what came before it, and when the C-series has been as good and consistent as it has, perhaps big swings for the fence aren’t necessary. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |